| Rank | Team | Delta |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ohio State | -- |
| 2 | Michigan |  1 |
| 3 | Texas | 1 |
| 4 | Auburn | 7 |
| 5 | West Virginia | 1 |
| 6 | Tennessee | 2 |
| 7 | Louisville |  2 |
| 8 | Florida | 6 |
| 9 | California | -- |
| 10 | LSU | 2 |
| 11 | Southern Cal | 4 |
| 12 | Clemson | 3 |
| 13 | Georgia Tech | 1 |
| 14 | Notre Dame | 1 |
| 15 | Arkansas | 5 |
| 16 | Rutgers | 1 |
| 17 | Wisconsin | 5 |
| 18 | Oregon | 5 |
| 19 | Oklahoma | 1 |
| 20 | Nebraska | 6 |
| 21 | Pittsburgh | 3 |
| 22 | Boston College | 4 |
| 23 | Boise State | 5 |
| 24 | Missouri | 5 |
| 25 | Wake Forest | 1 |
Dropped Out: Iowa (#16), Georgia (#21), North Carolina State (#25).
Games I watched:
VT-BC
Pitt-UCF
West Virginia-Syracuse
Florida-Auburn
Boise St.-NMS
-I had a tough time with the 3-4-5 spots, because I didn't think any of those teams really belonged there. But no one beneath them seems to belong there either, so I went with conventional wisdom. Or was it Voodoo?
- Southern Cal continues to disappoint. If they do get knocked off in one of their upcoming games I might not drop them so far, but for now I think it is a farce to have them ranked in the top 10.
-16 through 25 are there for having impressive records without a signature win. Beating Virginia Tech isn't a signature win, it's just a perk for the rest of the country.
Games I watched:
VT-BC
Pitt-UCF
West Virginia-Syracuse
Florida-Auburn
Boise St.-NMS
-I had a tough time with the 3-4-5 spots, because I didn't think any of those teams really belonged there. But no one beneath them seems to belong there either, so I went with conventional wisdom. Or was it Voodoo?
- Southern Cal continues to disappoint. If they do get knocked off in one of their upcoming games I might not drop them so far, but for now I think it is a farce to have them ranked in the top 10.
-16 through 25 are there for having impressive records without a signature win. Beating Virginia Tech isn't a signature win, it's just a perk for the rest of the country.
No comments:
Post a Comment